[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 02/22] Firmware interface code for IB device.
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 08:32:28AM -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Arjan> The bigger issue is: if people can't be bothered to do
> Arjan> those steps, why would they be bothered to do this for
> Arjan> maintenance and bugfixes etc etc? Basically it's now
> Arjan> already a de-facto unmaintained driver....
> I don't think that's really a fair statement. The IBM people have
> been active and responsive in maintaining their driving in the
> svn tree. However, they asked me to post their driver for
> review because it would be difficult for them to do it.

Checking stuff into a private svn tree is vastly different from posting
to lkml in public. In fact, it looks like the svn tree is so far ahead
of the in-kernel stuff, that most people are just using it instead of
the in-kernel code.

I know at least one company has asked a distro to just accept the svn
snapshot over the in-kernel IB code, which makes me wonder if the
in-kernel stuff is even useful to people? Why have it, if companies
insist on using the out-of-tree stuff instead?


greg k-h
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-18 19:17    [W:0.139 / U:0.648 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site