![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 20:42 +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > Fix two things. Firstly the unit is "Hz" not "HZ". Secondly it is useful > to have 300Hz support when doing multimedia work. 250 is fine for us in > Europe but the US frame rate is 30fps (29.99 blah for pedants). 300 > gives us a tick divisible by both 25 and 30, and for interlace work 50 > and 60. It's also giving similar performance to 250Hz. > I'd argue we should remove 250 and add 300, but that might be excess > disruption for now. the last time 300 was proposed the counter argument was that it was lousy in terms of PIT rounding... did you check that out? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-08 20:51 [W:0.118 / U:0.010 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||