![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes: > Fix two things. Firstly the unit is "Hz" not "HZ". Secondly it is useful > to have 300Hz support when doing multimedia work. 250 is fine for us in > Europe but the US frame rate is 30fps (29.99 blah for pedants). 300 > gives us a tick divisible by both 25 and 30, and for interlace work 50 > and 60. It's also giving similar performance to 250Hz. > > I'd argue we should remove 250 and add 300, but that might be excess > disruption for now. If we go down that path I would like to have 256. Why? There are still lots of systems with broken Interrupt 0 routing and usually on those the RTC works just fine. But unfortunately RTC can be only programmed to power of two frequencies. 256 would fit. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2006-11-10 08:39 [W:0.866 / U:0.040 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||