Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Jan 2006 18:31:11 -0600 (CST) | From | "Scott E. Preece" <> | Subject | Re: [linux-pm] [patch] pm: fix runtime powermanagement's /sys interface |
| |
OK - sorry, my misparsing of what you asked. I agree that wakeup would always be caused by some single device, not by multiple devices.
scott
| From mochel@digitalimplant.org Thu Jan 5 18:04:42 2006 | Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:02:29 -0800 (PST) | From: Patrick Mochel<mochel@digitalimplant.org> | cc: Pavel Machek<pavel@ucw.cz>, Alan Stern<stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, | | | On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Preece Scott-PREECE wrote: | | > This is, of course, in an embedded framework rather than a desktop | > framework - we suspend and wakeup automatically, not via user | > intervention. Answering a question asked in another piece of mail, we | > have roughly a dozen different devices that cause the system to wakeup - | > keypad press, touchscreen touch, flip open/close, etc. | | Hmm, it would be nice if that comment was in reply to the email in which | it came. At least if it was in the same thread.. | | Many systems have > 1 _possible_ wakeup devices (keyboard, touchscreen, | lid, etc). You implied that when a system wakes up, there could be > 1 | device that actually woke the system up, which is in direct conflict with | what I've always assumed - that when a system wakes up, it is caused by a | single device (and if there were multiple events, like a key press *and* a | mouse movement, it's doesn't really matter).. | | Thanks, | | | Patrick | |
-- scott preece motorola mobile devices, il67, 1800 s. oak st., champaign, il 61820 e-mail: preece@motorola.com fax: +1-217-384-8550 phone: +1-217-384-8589 cell: +1-217-433-6114 pager: 2174336114@vtext.com
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |