Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 3 Jul 2005 14:53:17 -0400 (EDT) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: [patch 5/12] lsm stacking v0.2: actual stacker module |
| |
On Sun, 3 Jul 2005, Tony Jones wrote:
> There just isn't enough content to justify a stacker specific filesystem IMHO.
It might be worth thinking about a more general securityfs as part of LSM, to be used by stacker and LSM modules. SELinux could use this instead of managing its own selinuxfs.
- James -- James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |