lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [patch 5/12] lsm stacking v0.2: actual stacker module
    Thanks for all your comments.

    Quoting Greg KH (greg@kroah.com):
    > On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 02:50:43PM -0500, serue@us.ibm.com wrote:
    > > +/* variables to hold kobject/sysfs data */
    > > +static struct subsystem stacker_subsys;
    >
    > Use decl_subsys please.
    >
    > And yes, James is right, only value per sysfs file is allowed.

    Hmm, I could instead have one file per loaded LSM, which could
    obviate the need for the stacker/unload file, but that would make
    it more work for a user to find the ordering of the LSMs. I wonder
    how much that would matter.

    I'll implement your other changes, and consider switching to a
    stackerfs (versus changing the content presentation under sysfs).

    thanks,
    -serge
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-07-03 02:29    [W:5.485 / U:0.076 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site