lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, plist fixes
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> yes, it's supposed to be used for user-space PI too. What do you mean by
> 'completely bounded'. Do you consider the current worst-case O(100)
> property of plists a 'completely bounded' solution?
>
> i dont think fusyn's should be made available to non-RT tasks. If this
> restriction is preserved then fusyn's would become O(max_nr_RT_tasks)
> too.

I think making fusyn RT tasks only would be asking a lot. Fusyn
replaces Futex, and they are both used in pthreads. So non-RT tasks
wouldn't be able to use pthreads in userspace, or a big chunk of pthread
..

Daniel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-06-06 17:10    [W:0.069 / U:6.012 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site