![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
* Esben Nielsen <simlo@phys.au.dk> wrote: > [...] In extreme load situations we could end up with a lot of waiters > on mmap_sem forinstance. what do you mean by extreme load. Extreme number of RT tasks, or extreme number of tasks altogether? The sorted-list implementation i had in -RT had all non-RT tasks handled in an O(1) way - the O(N) component was for adding RT tasks (removal was O(1)). so the question is - can we have an extreme (larger than 140) number of RT tasks? If yes, why are they all RT - they can have no expectation of good latencies with a possible load factor of 140! Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-06-05 13:54 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||