Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:21:49 +0200 | From | Stefan Seyfried <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Add some hooks to generic suspend code |
| |
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Anyway, it should not be arch-dependend. We need one good mechanism of > notifying userland, not one per architecture.
Yes.
>> Sure, ideally. However, existing X knows how to deal with APM events, >> and thus APM emulation is an important thing to get something that >> works. Pne thing I should do is consolidate PPC APM emu with ARM one as >> I think Russell improve my stuff significantly. > > Perhaps we need apm emulation on i386, too?
No. This is too ugly for words IMO. If we have one good mechanism of notifying userland, X can use this mechanism. Let's kill APM, not keep it alive. -- Stefan Seyfried QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out." - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |