[lkml]   [2005]   [Jun]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Add some hooks to generic suspend code
    On Thu, 2005-06-02 at 18:21 +0200, Stefan Seyfried wrote:

    > >> Sure, ideally. However, existing X knows how to deal with APM events,
    > >> and thus APM emulation is an important thing to get something that
    > >> works. Pne thing I should do is consolidate PPC APM emu with ARM one as
    > >> I think Russell improve my stuff significantly.
    > >
    > > Perhaps we need apm emulation on i386, too?
    > No. This is too ugly for words IMO. If we have one good mechanism of
    > notifying userland, X can use this mechanism. Let's kill APM, not keep
    > it alive.

    Euh... maybe but I still think we need to keep this userland interface
    alive for a little while. At least ARM and PPC have existing stuff that
    rely on it.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-06-03 00:23    [W:0.020 / U:42.144 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site