lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
	by smtp.nexlab.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B462DFB80

for <chiakotay@nexlab.it>; Tue, 24 May 2005 10:01:51 +0200 (CEST)

Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand

id S261424AbVEXH7w (ORCPT <rfc822;chiakotay@nexlab.it>);

Tue, 24 May 2005 03:59:52 -0400

Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261423AbVEXH7w

(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);

Tue, 24 May 2005 03:59:52 -0400

Received: from mx1.elte.hu ([157.181.1.137]:54227 "EHLO mx1.elte.hu")

by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261431AbVEXH7k (ORCPT

<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);

Tue, 24 May 2005 03:59:40 -0400

Received: from chiara.elte.hu (chiara.elte.hu [157.181.150.200])

by mx1.elte.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9302432329E;

Tue, 24 May 2005 09:58:04 +0200 (CEST)

Received: by chiara.elte.hu (Postfix, from userid 17806)

id AB1CA1FC2; Tue, 24 May 2005 09:59:37 +0200 (CEST)

Date: Tue, 24 May 2005 09:59:27 +0200

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: George Anzinger <george@mvista.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwalker@mvista.com
Subject: Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc4-V0.7.47-00

Message-ID: <20050524075927.GA20462@elte.hu>

References: <20050509073702.GA13615@elte.hu> <427FBFE1.5020204@mvista.com>

Mime-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Content-Disposition: inline

In-Reply-To: <427FBFE1.5020204@mvista.com>

User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

X-ELTE-SpamVersion: MailScanner 4.31.6-itk1 (ELTE 1.2) SpamAssassin 2.63 ClamAV 0.73

X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean

X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no

X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-4.9, required 5.9,

autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -4.90

X-ELTE-SpamLevel:

X-ELTE-SpamScore: -4

Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org




* George Anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:

> Also, I think that del_timer_sync and friends need to be turned on if
> soft_irq is preemptable.

you mean the #ifdef CONFIG_SMP should be:

#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS)

?

Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-24 12:10    [W:0.041 / U:0.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site