lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [May]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFD] What error should FS return when I/O failure occurs?
From
Date
On Mon, 2005-05-16 at 11:42, Chris Siebenmann wrote:
> You write:
> | When I/O failure occurs, there should be some standards which
> | define the ONLY error that should be returned from VFS, right?
>
> In practice there is no standard and there never will be any standard.
> In general the only thing code can do on any write error is to abort
> the operation, regardless of what errno is. (The exceptions are for
> things like nonblocking IO, where 'EAGAIN' and 'EWOULDBLOCK' are not
> real errors.)
Yes, we're sure to abort the operation, but we can't use
exit(EXIT_FAILURE) directly. For HA environment, we should
identify the cause of the error, take correspondent action,
right? So we need to get the right error.
> ---
> "I shall clasp my hands together and bow to the corners of the world."
> Number Ten Ox, "Bridge of Birds"
> cks@utcc.toronto.edu utgpu!cks

regards,
----
Qu Fuping


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-05-17 06:40    [W:0.035 / U:0.264 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site