Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 4 Apr 2005 17:49:23 +0100 | From | Russell King <> | Subject | Re: Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in arm |
| |
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:44:14PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > This fixes u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in arm. I was not able to > > > even compile it, but it should not cause any problems. Please apply, > > > > On testing this patch, it doesn't build. You need to include > > linux/pm.h into linux/sysdev.h for starters, and fix sysdev.h > > to also use pm_message_t in it's function pointers. > > > > Therefore, I'd like the following patch either to be in mainline first, > > or in my ARM tree for Linus to pull so ARM doesn't completely break > > on my next merge. > > That patch was recently merged into -mm, so I hope its okay... Thanks > for testing. (And sorry, I did not realize patches depend on each > other this way).
Grumble. So it hasn't been merged before the ARM changes, which means mainline is now broken for ARM. I knew I should've just thrown it straight in along with the stuff depending on it. ;(
Linus - is the pm.h included in sysdev.h in -rc2?
-- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: 2.6 Serial core - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |