Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 3 Apr 2005 12:44:14 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Fix u32 vs. pm_message_t in arm |
| |
Hi!
> > This fixes u32 vs. pm_message_t confusion in arm. I was not able to > > even compile it, but it should not cause any problems. Please apply, > > On testing this patch, it doesn't build. You need to include > linux/pm.h into linux/sysdev.h for starters, and fix sysdev.h > to also use pm_message_t in it's function pointers. > > Therefore, I'd like the following patch either to be in mainline first, > or in my ARM tree for Linus to pull so ARM doesn't completely break > on my next merge.
That patch was recently merged into -mm, so I hope its okay... Thanks for testing. (And sorry, I did not realize patches depend on each other this way).
Pavel
-- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |