![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> writes: > > > please always used fixes-size types for user communication. also please > > avoid ioctls like the rest of the IB codebase. > > Could someone please explain to me how the uverbs abuse of write > is better that ioctl? It's actually worse because if they have a 32bit compat issue then ioctl can be fixed up, but read/write can't. I wish the people arguing against ioctl all the time would just stop that because the alternatives are usually worse. > - 64bit compilers will not pad every structure to 8 bytes. This > only will happen if you happen to have an 8 byte element in your > structure that is only aligned to 32bits by a 32bit structure. > Unfortunately the 32bit gcc only aligns long long to 32bits on > x86, which triggers the described behavior. Exactly - and driver writers usually don't get that right so we need to have a tool to fix it up in the end. And with ioctl that's easiest. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-12-18 04:28 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||