[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs
    On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:03:24AM -0700, john stultz wrote:
    > >From your dmesg, it appears that there are no other timesources other
    > then the TSC available on your hardware. So I'm guessing idle=poll is
    > keeping the CPUs from halting the TSC and keeping them synched.
    > I would think that the ACPI PM timer would be supported, but I don't see
    > anything about it in your dmesg. Could you make sure it is properly
    > configured in?

    Yes, I tried different combinations of PM_TIMER and HPET options.
    In this try, PM_TIMER was definetly enabled in kernel config.

    What kind of kernel message did you expect from workibf PM timer?

    With best regards,
    Vladimir Savkin.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-10-10 20:14    [W:0.022 / U:34.960 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site