Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Oct 2005 20:19:42 +0200 | From | Jonas Oreland <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs |
| |
Hi,
check http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5283
/Jonas
Vladimir B. Savkin wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:03:24AM -0700, john stultz wrote: > >>>From your dmesg, it appears that there are no other timesources other >>then the TSC available on your hardware. So I'm guessing idle=poll is >>keeping the CPUs from halting the TSC and keeping them synched. >> >> >>I would think that the ACPI PM timer would be supported, but I don't see >>anything about it in your dmesg. Could you make sure it is properly >>configured in? > > > Yes, I tried different combinations of PM_TIMER and HPET options. > In this try, PM_TIMER was definetly enabled in kernel config. > > What kind of kernel message did you expect from workibf PM timer? > > ~ > :wq > With best regards, > Vladimir Savkin. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |