lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] x86-64: Fix bad assumption that dualcore cpus have synced TSCs
Hi,

check http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5283

/Jonas

Vladimir B. Savkin wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 11:03:24AM -0700, john stultz wrote:
>
>>>From your dmesg, it appears that there are no other timesources other
>>then the TSC available on your hardware. So I'm guessing idle=poll is
>>keeping the CPUs from halting the TSC and keeping them synched.
>>
>>
>>I would think that the ACPI PM timer would be supported, but I don't see
>>anything about it in your dmesg. Could you make sure it is properly
>>configured in?
>
>
> Yes, I tried different combinations of PM_TIMER and HPET options.
> In this try, PM_TIMER was definetly enabled in kernel config.
>
> What kind of kernel message did you expect from workibf PM timer?
>
> ~
> :wq
> With best regards,
> Vladimir Savkin.
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-10-10 20:23    [W:0.181 / U:0.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site