Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Sep 2004 01:29:39 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] removes unnessary print of space |
| |
Kirill Korotaev <dev@sw.ru> wrote: > > I've noticed another thing. There is a default bust_spinlocks() in > lib/bust_spinlocks.c. 4 architectures including x86 have their own > copies of it, which are exactly the same as the default one. > > So do we really need lib/bust_spinlocks.c or we can move a signle copy > of this function to kernel/printk.c?
I'd leave it as is - nobody's complaining.
In the more modern scheme of things we'd move that file to kernel/ and require that per-arch Kconfigs define CONFIG_NEED_GENERIC_BUST_SPINLOCKS, then use that in kernel/Makefile. But doing that now would be gratuitous noise, IMO.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |