[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: mlock(1)
    * Chris Friesen ( wrote:
    > Chris Wright wrote:
    > > 2. Problem is the execve(2) that the mlock(1) program would have to call.
    > > This blows away the mappings which contain the locking info.
    > Does it? The man page said it isn't inherited on fork(), but why wouldn't it
    > be inherited on exec()?

    The info is stored in the memory mapping info that's necessarily blown
    away at execve(2) because that's where you are overlaying a new image.

    Linux Security Modules
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.024 / U:70.340 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site