[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: mlock(1)
    Chris Wright wrote:

    > 2. Problem is the execve(2) that the mlock(1) program would have to call.
    > This blows away the mappings which contain the locking info.

    Does it? The man page said it isn't inherited on fork(), but why wouldn't it be
    inherited on exec()?

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:06    [W:0.019 / U:28.176 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site