Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 3 Sep 2004 02:47:49 +0200 | From | Spam <> | Subject | Re: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives |
| |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1
> Oliver Neukum wrote: > | Am Donnerstag, 2. September 2004 11:52 schrieb Spam: > | |>> Btw, version control for ordinary files would be a great feature. I |>> think something like it is available through Windows 2000/3 server. |>> Isn't it called "Shadow Copies". It works over network shares. :) |>> |>> It allows you to restore previous versions of the file even if you |>> delete or overwrite it. > | > | > | There's no need to do that in kernel, unless you want to be able > | to force it unto users.
> And on apps. Should I teach OpenOffice.org to do version control? > Seems a lot easier to just do it in the kernel, and teach everything to > do version control in one fell swoop.
Do you mean in the kernel or as a filesystem/VFS plugin that would extend the functionality to include version control?
~S
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |