lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Sep]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: The argument for fs assistance in handling archives
Date
Am Freitag, 3. September 2004 10:13 schrieb Christoph Hellwig:
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 07:43:34PM -0500, David Masover wrote:

> > | There's no need to do that in kernel, unless you want to be able
> > | to force it unto users.
> >
> > And on apps. Should I teach OpenOffice.org to do version control?
> > Seems a lot easier to just do it in the kernel, and teach everything to
> > do version control in one fell swoop.
>
> Just add a post-save trigger that can check it into any SCM you want.

That depends on whom you refer to. If you want to impose the RCS
on the users as an administrative measure and force compliance, then
you'll need to do it in kernel.
I see some nasty issues with disk quotas there.

Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:05    [W:0.600 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site