Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Sep 2004 12:27:27 +0000 | From | "J.A. Magallon" <> | Subject | Problems with raid in 2.6.9-rc1-mm4 |
| |
Hi...
I try to set up a RAID in linux 2.6. I succeeded in one other box, building a raid5 disk on top of SATA drives.
In this box, I have a 240Gb disk plus two 120Gb ones:
annwn:~# fdisk -l /dev/hd[acd]
Disk /dev/hda: 251.0 GB, 251000193024 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 30515 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 1 30515 245111706 fd Linux raid autodetect
Disk /dev/hdc: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdc1 1 14593 117218241 fd Linux raid autodetect
Disk /dev/hdd: 120.0 GB, 120034123776 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 14593 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hdd1 1 14593 117218241 fd Linux raid autodetect
As disks are of different sizes, I though about doing a volume with the small ones, and then a raid with the big. As stripping on two IDE disks on the same IDE bus is silly, I wanted to do a linear array. So this is what I would like:
/dev/md1 (raid0) -- /dev/hda1 (240Gb) \- /dev/md0 (raid linear) -- /dev/hdc1 \- /dev/hdd1
I built both arrays with:
#!/bin/bash
mdadm -S /dev/md0 mdadm --create --verbose --run \ /dev/md0 --level=linear --chunk=64 \ --raid-devices=2 \ /dev/hdc1 /dev/hdd1
mdadm -S /dev/md1 mdadm --create --verbose --run \ /dev/md1 --level=0 --chunk=64 \ --raid-devices=2 \ /dev/hda1 /dev/md0
But on reboot, md0 is autodetected, but not so md1 ???? Log:
Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: linear personality registered as nr 1 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: raid0 personality registered as nr 2 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: raid1 personality registered as nr 3 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: raid10 personality registered as nr 9 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: raid5 personality registered as nr 4 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid5: automatically using best checksumming function: pIII_sse Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: pIII_sse : 2248.000 MB/sec Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid5: using function: pIII_sse (2248.000 MB/sec) Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid6: int32x1 468 MB/s Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid6: int32x2 585 MB/s Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn rpc.statd[3113]: statd running as root. chown /var/lib/nfs/sm to choose different user Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid6: int32x4 476 MB/s Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid6: int32x8 355 MB/s Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid6: mmxx1 1460 MB/s Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid6: mmxx2 1832 MB/s Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid6: sse1x1 882 MB/s Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid6: sse1x2 1609 MB/s Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid6: sse2x1 1964 MB/s Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid6: sse2x2 2000 MB/s Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid6: using algorithm sse2x2 (2000 MB/s) Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: raid6 personality registered as nr 8 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: multipath personality registered as nr 7 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: md driver 0.90.0 MAX_MD_DEVS=256, MD_SB_DISKS=27 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: Autodetecting RAID arrays. Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: autorun ... Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: considering hdd1 ... Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: adding hdd1 ... Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: adding hdc1 ... Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: hda1 has different UUID to hdd1 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: created md0 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: bind<hdc1> Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: bind<hdd1> Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: running: <hdd1><hdc1> Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: considering hda1 ... Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: adding hda1 ... Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: created md1 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: bind<hda1> Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: running: <hda1> Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md1: setting max_sectors to 128, segment boundary to 32767 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid0: looking at hda1 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid0: comparing hda1(245111616) with hda1(245111616) Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid0: END Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid0: ==> UNIQUE Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid0: 1 zones Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid0: FINAL 1 zones Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: raid0: too few disks (1 of 2) - aborting! Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: pers->run() failed ... Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md :do_md_run() returned -22 Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: md1 stopped. Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: unbind<hda1> Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: export_rdev(hda1) Sep 13 13:12:49 annwn kernel: md: ... autorun DONE.
What is the problem ? The kernel can't detect that md0 is part of an array ? Is this setup possible at all ? Do I have to partition md0 and create a 'fd' partition ?
Aside, I have thogut of this a a possible solution: split hda in two, and buid a raid0 with hda1,hdc1,hda2,hdd1 (hda is faster...). Is this so stupid as it looks to me (think of rplacinf hda2 when it fails....).
TIA
-- J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()able!es> \ Software is like sex: werewolf!able!es \ It's better when it's free Mandrakelinux release 10.1 (RC 1) for i586 Linux 2.6.9-rc1-mm4 (gcc 3.4.1 (Mandrakelinux (Alpha 3.4.1-3mdk)) #2
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |