Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 10 Jul 2004 09:02:55 +0200 | From | Andrea Arcangeli <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Use NULL instead of integer 0 in security/selinux/ |
| |
On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 12:43:16PM +0100, P. Benie wrote: > the integer 0 and null pointers are not the same, the compiler will > perform the appropriate conversion for you, so it is always correct to > define NULL as (void *)0.
exactly, the compiler knows about that.
> Personally, I always use 0 and NULL for integers and null pointers > respectively, but that's because of long estalished conventions that make > the code readabile, rather than anything to do with validity of the code.
Yep. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |