[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use NULL instead of integer 0 in security/selinux/
Richard B. Johnson writes:

> On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, P. Benie wrote:
>> False. "An integer constant expressions with the value 0, or such an
>> expression cast to type void *, is called a null pointer constant. If a
>> null pointer constant is assigned to or compared for equality with a
>> pointer, the constant is converted to a pointer of that type", and "Any
>> two null pointers shall compare equal."
>> In other words, when you use 0 as a null pointer, you really do get a null
>> pointer. If you are working on an architecture where the bit pattern of
>> the integer 0 and null pointers are not the same, the compiler will
>> perform the appropriate conversion for you, so it is always correct to
>> define NULL as (void *)0.
> That's NOT what is says. It states that a NULL pointer is converted to
> the appropriate type before any comparison is made. It does NOT say
> that 0 is a valid null-pointer.

Could you please elaborate the rules of English in which "An integer
constant expresion with the value 0 [...] is called a null pointer
constant" does not mean that 0 is a null pointer? 0 is certainly an
integer constant expression with the value 0, so there must be
something extraordinarily subtle in the second half of the sentence.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.058 / U:3.712 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site