[lkml]   [2004]   [Jul]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Use NULL instead of integer 0 in security/selinux/
    Richard B. Johnson writes:

    > On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, P. Benie wrote:
    >> False. "An integer constant expressions with the value 0, or such an
    >> expression cast to type void *, is called a null pointer constant. If a
    >> null pointer constant is assigned to or compared for equality with a
    >> pointer, the constant is converted to a pointer of that type", and "Any
    >> two null pointers shall compare equal."
    >> In other words, when you use 0 as a null pointer, you really do get a null
    >> pointer. If you are working on an architecture where the bit pattern of
    >> the integer 0 and null pointers are not the same, the compiler will
    >> perform the appropriate conversion for you, so it is always correct to
    >> define NULL as (void *)0.
    > That's NOT what is says. It states that a NULL pointer is converted to
    > the appropriate type before any comparison is made. It does NOT say
    > that 0 is a valid null-pointer.

    Could you please elaborate the rules of English in which "An integer
    constant expresion with the value 0 [...] is called a null pointer
    constant" does not mean that 0 is a null pointer? 0 is certainly an
    integer constant expression with the value 0, so there must be
    something extraordinarily subtle in the second half of the sentence.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:04    [W:0.022 / U:14.704 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site