Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 7 Mar 2004 17:08:24 +0100 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: External kernel modules, second try |
| |
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 05:05:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 03:01:31PM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > and it's missing the symbols from > > > module files. > > > > sure but the module files are generally installed... > I'm aiming for a situation where I can build external modules, > using an almost clean kernel src tree.
Personally I don't see the point. I'm perfectly happy with the current situation with the exception of not using System.map and co.
From a distribution kernel pov; I already ship a subset of files for building modules against (basically include/, the KConfig and makefiles), which only not 100% works because I don't ship vmlinux.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |