Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | Re: Limit hash table size | From | Jes Sorensen <> | Date | 09 Feb 2004 18:12:13 -0500 |
| |
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
Andrew> "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> wrote: >> Andrew, >> >> Will you merge the changes in the network area first while I'm >> working on the solution suggested here for inode and dentry? The >> 2GB tcp hash is the biggest problem for us right now.
Andrew> Is there some reason why TCP could not also end up creating Andrew> 100's of millions of objects?
Andrew,
I think the likelihood that TCP will generate that is quite small, it would require a fairly significant number of network interfaces and I doubt people with 1TB RAM boxes will throw in 256 10GigE interfaces and run them all flat out.
Cheers, Jes - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |