Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:23:55 -0800 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: Limit hash table size |
| |
"Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com> wrote: > > Andrew, > > Will you merge the changes in the network area first while I'm working > on the solution suggested here for inode and dentry? The 2GB tcp hash is > the biggest problem for us right now.
Is there some reason why TCP could not also end up creating 100's of millions of objects?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |