[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: kgdb support in vanilla 2.6.2

    > > need to take a look at such things and really convice ourselves that
    > > they're worthwhile. Personally, I'd only be interested in the basic stub.
    > What I found always extremly ugly in the i386 stub was that it uses
    > magic globals to talk to the page fault handler. For the x86-64
    > version I replaced that by just using __get/__put_user in the memory
    > accesses, which is much cleaner. I would suggest doing that for i386
    > too.
    > Also what's also ugly in i386 is that it uses ugly hooks in traps.c/fault.c.
    > On x86-64 I instead added generic notifiers (see include/asm-x86_64/die.h
    > and notify_die in arch/x86_64/kernel/traps.c)
    > where both kdb and kgdb and possibly dprobes and other debuggers can hook
    > in without conflicting patches for the same files from everybody.
    > I would strongly suggest to adopt such a generic framework for i386 too
    > to clean up the core kernel <-> debugger interaction. As soon as this
    > frame work is in just dropping the stub is is very clean.
    > The x86-64 version should be pretty simple to port to i386 if someone
    > is interested ...

    Hmm, this tells me that perhaps it is reasonable to get amd64 version
    in first, since it received lot of cleaning already...
    When do you have a heart between your knees?
    [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?]
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.020 / U:8.696 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site