lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From"Kyle" <>
SubjectRe: ICH5 with 2.6.1 very slow
DateFri, 6 Feb 2004 01:27:17 +0800
Yes they are PATA, I expect something like 40-50MB/s, now my much slower
Celeron 1.3T with 80GB/2M perform better than my ICH5!

Kyle

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bas Mevissen" <ml@basmevissen.nl>
To: "Kyle" <kyle@southa.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: ICH5 with 2.6.1 very slow

> Kyle wrote:>> > Problem with ICH5?> > I read the list web, so please CC my email, thanks.
> >> > P4 2.6G HT, 2GB Ram, ICH5, WD250GB/8M x 2  (md raid 1), kernel 2.6.1
> > Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.14 seconds =882.89 MB/sec
> > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.14 seconds = 29.93 MB/sec
> >> > Celeron 1.3T, 1GB Ram, SIS630/5513, WD80GB/2M x 2 (md raid 1), kernel
2.6.1
> > Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.24 seconds =103.08 MB/sec
> > Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 1.83 seconds = 35.00 MB/sec
> >> > Celeron 2.5G, 512MB Ram, i845/ICH4, WD120GB/8M x 2 (md raid 1), redhat
> > kernel 2.4.20> > Timing buffer-cache reads:   128 MB in  0.35 seconds =365.71 MB/sec
> > Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  1.38 seconds = 46.38 MB/sec
> >>> Is that a parallel IDE? I own a S-ATA IDE (also WD) with an ICH5. That
> performs around 45-50MB/sec with 2.6.1. I've never tried 2.4.xx on it.
>> Bas.>>>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:00    [from the cache]
©2003-2008