Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: Intel vs AMD x86-64 | Date | Tue, 24 Feb 2004 19:24:31 -0800 | From | "Nakajima, Jun" <> |
| |
No, it's not a problem. Branches with 16-bit operand size are not useful for compilers.
Jun >-----Original Message----- >From: Chris Wedgwood [mailto:cw@f00f.org] >Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 5:53 PM >To: Nakajima, Jun >Cc: Pavel Machek; Linus Torvalds; Adrian Bunk; Herbert Poetzl; Mikael >Pettersson; Kernel Mailing List >Subject: Re: Intel vs AMD x86-64 > >On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:15:18PM -0800, Nakajima, Jun wrote: > >> Near branch with 66H prefix: >> As documented in PRM the behavior is implementation specific and >> should avoid using 66H prefix on near branches. > >Presumably this isn't a problem with current gcc's right? >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |