Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Feb 2004 16:53:29 +0000 | From | Jamie Lokier <> | Subject | Re: kthread, signals and PF_FREEZE (suspend) |
| |
Rusty Russell wrote: > > That means that signal_pending() will return true for that process which > > will make kthread stop the thread. > > Yes, the way they are currently coded. I had assumed that spurious > signals do not occur.
Yowch. Does suspend mean this warning in futex_wait is wrong?
/* A spurious wakeup should never happen. */ WARN_ON(!signal_pending(current)); return -EINTR;
-- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |