![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
In message <20040216165329.GB17323@mail.shareable.org> you write: > Rusty Russell wrote: > > > That means that signal_pending() will return true for that process which > > > will make kthread stop the thread. > > > > Yes, the way they are currently coded. I had assumed that spurious > > signals do not occur. > > Yowch. Does suspend mean this warning in futex_wait is wrong? > > /* A spurious wakeup should never happen. */ > WARN_ON(!signal_pending(current)); > return -EINTR; That's why it's a WARN_ON not a BUG_ON, and why suspend is experimental. But the bug reports we've seen didn't mention "I was suspending when..." Although Dirk has CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND=y. Cheers, Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||