lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Time sliced CFQ io scheduler
Hi,

One more test case, while the box is booted... This just demonstrates a
process doing a file write (bs=64k) with a competing process doing a
file read (bs=64k) at the same time, again capped at 30sec.

deadline:
Reader: 2520KiB/sec (max_lat=45msec)
Writer: 1258KiB/sec (max_lat=85msec)

as:
Reader: 27985KiB/sec (max_lat=34msec)
Writer: 64KiB/sec (max_lat=1042msec)

cfq:
Reader: 12703KiB/sec (max_lat=108msec)
Writer: 9743KiB/sec (max_lat=89msec)

If you look at vmstat while running these tests, cfq and deadline give
equal bandwidth for the reader and writer all the time, while as
basically doesn't give anything to the writer (a single block per second
only). Nick, is the write batching broken or something?

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.510 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site