lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Time sliced CFQ io scheduler
Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
>
> as:
> Reader: 27985KiB/sec (max_lat=34msec)
> Writer: 64KiB/sec (max_lat=1042msec)
>
> cfq:
> Reader: 12703KiB/sec (max_lat=108msec)
> Writer: 9743KiB/sec (max_lat=89msec)
>
> If you look at vmstat while running these tests, cfq and deadline give
> equal bandwidth for the reader and writer all the time, while as
> basically doesn't give anything to the writer (a single block per second
> only). Nick, is the write batching broken or something?

Looks like it. We used to do 2/3rds-read, 1/3rd-write in that testcase.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.126 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site