Messages in this thread | | | From | Blaisorblade <> | Subject | Why INSTALL_PATH is not /boot by default? | Date | Tue, 16 Nov 2004 01:27:15 +0100 |
| |
This line, in the main Makefile, is commented:
export INSTALL_PATH=/boot
Why? It seems pointless, since almost everything has been for ages requiring this settings, and distros' versions of installkernel have been taking an empty INSTALL_PATH as meaning /boot for ages (for instance Mandrake). It's maybe even mandated by the FHS (dunno).
Is there any reason I'm missing? -- Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade Linux registered user n. 292729 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |