Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Semaphore assembly-code bug | From | Andi Kleen <> | Date | 30 Oct 2004 04:13:10 +0200 |
| |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
> Anyway, it's quite likely that for several CPU's the fastest sequence ends > up actually being > > movl 4(%esp),%ecx > movl 8(%esp),%edx > movl 12(%esp),%eax > addl $16,%esp > > which is also one of the biggest alternatives.
For K8 it should be the fastest way. K7 probably too.
-Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |