Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 5 Sep 2003 12:32:07 +0200 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: swsusp: revert to 2.6.0-test3 state |
| |
Hi!
> > No, you have to understand that I don't want to call software_suspend() at > > all. You've made the choice not to accept the swsusp changes, so we're > > forking the code. We will have competing implementations of > > suspend-to-disk in the kernel. > > And the fork happened in 2.6.0-test4? > > Some how I thought the 6, being even, meant stable. > > I am at a complete loss how these test3 to test4 major changes > that broke everything meet with the often repeated definitions > of how kernel development is to be accomplished. > > Perhaps I missed something, development kernels include all > odd numbers and 6?
Patrick decided 6 is odd for him and Linus failed to stop that :-(. We are working on fixing it up now. Hopefully in -test6 or so time it works at least as good as it did in -test3, then there's some chance for improvement (some of his patches actually look pretty good). Pavel -- Horseback riding is like software... ...vgf orggre jura vgf serr. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |