Messages in this thread | | | From | brian@worldcon ... | Date | Thu, 4 Sep 2003 21:13:16 -0700 | Subject | Re: swsusp: revert to 2.6.0-test3 state |
| |
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 08:25:38AM -0700, Patrick Mochel wrote: > No, you have to understand that I don't want to call software_suspend() at > all. You've made the choice not to accept the swsusp changes, so we're > forking the code. We will have competing implementations of > suspend-to-disk in the kernel.
And the fork happened in 2.6.0-test4?
Some how I thought the 6, being even, meant stable.
I am at a complete loss how these test3 to test4 major changes that broke everything meet with the often repeated definitions of how kernel development is to be accomplished.
Perhaps I missed something, development kernels include all odd numbers and 6?
-- Brian Litzinger - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |