lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: swsusp: revert to 2.6.0-test3 state
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 08:25:38AM -0700, Patrick Mochel wrote:
> No, you have to understand that I don't want to call software_suspend() at
> all. You've made the choice not to accept the swsusp changes, so we're
> forking the code. We will have competing implementations of
> suspend-to-disk in the kernel.

And the fork happened in 2.6.0-test4?

Some how I thought the 6, being even, meant stable.

I am at a complete loss how these test3 to test4 major changes
that broke everything meet with the often repeated definitions
of how kernel development is to be accomplished.

Perhaps I missed something, development kernels include all
odd numbers and 6?

--
Brian Litzinger
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:48    [W:0.200 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site