Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 12 Aug 2003 14:44:29 -0400 | From | Timothy Miller <> | Subject | Re: WINE + Galciv + 2.6.0-test3-mm1-O15 |
| |
Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > That sounds suspiciously similar to my scenario, but mine requires a > third element to trigger. > > <scritch scritch scritch> > > What about this? In both your senario and mine, X is running low on > cash while doing work at the request of a client right? Charge for it. > If X is lower on cash than the guy he's working for, pick the client's > pocket... take the remainder of your slice from his sleep_avg for your > trouble. If you're not in_interrupt(), nothing's free. Similar to > Robinhood, but you take from the rich, and keep it :) He's probably > going straight to the bank after he wakes you anyway, so he likely won't > even miss it. Instead of backboost of overflow, which can cause nasty > problems, you could try backtheft.
How is this different from back-boost?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |