lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Are linux-fs's drive-fault-tolerant by concept?
From
Date
On Sul, 2003-04-20 at 18:21, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> I know you favor a layer between low-level driver and fs probably. Sure it is
> clean design, and sure it sounds like overhead (Yet Another Layer).

Wrong again - its actually irrelevant to the cost of mirroring data, the cost
is entirely in the PCI and memory bandwidth. The raid1 management overhead is
almost nil

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [W:1.968 / U:0.036 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site