lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2
On Wed, Mar 19 2003, Joel Becker wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 05:57:26PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Joel Becker <Joel.Becker@oracle.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2
> > >
> > > Runs: 1374.22 1487.19 1437.26
> > >
> >
> > That is with elevator=as?
>
> Yes, it is as. On Nick's recommendation I didn't consider a
> deadline run a priority. The regular deadline runs have been 1550-1590,
> which is indeed statistically significant.

Hmm that's a bit odd IMHO, the deadline runs are nice for comparison. If
there's a variation between -mmX and -mmY, and deadline + as have
consistent scores, then it would be a good clue.

Besides, deadline is still the most solid choice.

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans