lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: WimMark I report for 2.5.65-mm2
On Thu, Mar 20 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
> >
> > Besides, deadline is still the most solid choice.
>
> Deadline will always be the best choice for OLTP workloads. Or CFQ - it
> should perform the same.
>
> All this workload does is seeks all over the disk doing teeny synchronous
> I/O's. It is the worst-case for AS.
>
> What we are trying to do at present is to make AS not _too_ bad for these
> workloads so that people with mixed workloads or who are not familiar with
> kernel arcanery don't accidentally end up with something which is
> significantly slower than it should be.
>
> It is an interesting test case.

I understand that. A deadline run is still interesting if there are
regressions from -mm2 to -mm3, for example. If deadline shows the same
regression, it's likely not a newly introduced AS bug.

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:34    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site