Messages in this thread | | | From | (Måns Rullgård) | Subject | Re: udev sysfs docs Re: State of devfs in 2.6? | Date | Tue, 09 Dec 2003 10:45:42 +0100 |
| |
Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:
>> I'd be interested in a solution to this, mostly out of curiosity since >> it seems like it might be interesting, but I don't see a nice one coming >> easily. I wouldn't mind someone more clueful telling me I'm wrong, >> though. At the least, it means more people being receptive to moving >> to udev. > > Solution for a problem that is non-existant on a properly configured > system? Why? :)
Apparently, there are people that want the functionality. Besides, why was it introduced in the first place, if not as a solution to some problem or other?
-- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |