![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:39:56AM -0600, Matthew Reppert wrote: > > My guess is, unfortunately, udev probably won't handle this any time > soon. (Or, if it does, through some possibly clever mechanism that, as > someone unfamiliar with the relevant bits of the system, I can't see.) udev will never handle it. That's not its job. > I'd be interested in a solution to this, mostly out of curiosity since > it seems like it might be interesting, but I don't see a nice one coming > easily. I wouldn't mind someone more clueful telling me I'm wrong, > though. At the least, it means more people being receptive to moving > to udev. Solution for a problem that is non-existant on a properly configured system? Why? :) greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||