Messages in this thread | | | Subject | balance interrupts | From | Julien Oster <> | Date | Mon, 08 Dec 2003 18:59:36 +0100 |
| |
Hello!
Now that my IO-APIC finally works without lockups (thanks to all!) on my nforce2 boards, my interrupts are much less crowded. However, there's still one line in /proc/interrupts which I don't really like, it's also the only line where more than one piece of hardware shares the same interrupt:
18: 445160 IO-APIC-level ide2, ide3, eth0
ide2 and ide3 are my onboard Silicon Image SATA controller. I guess you can't keep them apart on to different interrupts, since it's only one chip which is most probably connected to one IRQ line only.
But I don't think that eth0 has to be on the same interrupt as my SATA controller. So, how do I make it go away to another place? I would be fine sharing it with e.g. eth1, which is alone on IRQ 19.
BTW, the whole /proc/interrupts looks like this:
CPU0 0: 40022145 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 62950 IO-APIC-edge i8042 2: 0 XT-PIC cascade 8: 681626 IO-APIC-edge rtc 9: 0 IO-APIC-level acpi 12: 55 IO-APIC-edge i8042 14: 968274 IO-APIC-edge ide0 15: 1789182 IO-APIC-edge ide1 16: 404489 IO-APIC-level EMU10K1 18: 445160 IO-APIC-level ide2, ide3, eth0 19: 1596427 IO-APIC-level eth1 20: 0 IO-APIC-level ohci_hcd 21: 0 IO-APIC-level NVidia nForce2 22: 36730 IO-APIC-level ohci_hcd NMI: 0 LOC: 40021891 ERR: 0 MIS: 310
Regards, Julien - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |