![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Nick Piggin <piggin@cyberone.com.au> wrote: > > > > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > >So i believe the generic relaxing of sched_clock() synchronization is > >the right thing to do. I like your patch. It adds minimal overhead and > >solves a hard problem - nice work! Andrew, please apply it. > > > > > > Its a great looking patch if you must have high res sched_clock. So > I guess I agree with it. miaow ;) > Can we have a scheduler day when Andrew is ready to take patches for > it? I have a few small changes that I'd like to get merged soon too > (not sched domains - that should probably go to the mm tree for a while) > > Relevant patches are > sched-ctx-count-preempt.patch > sched-fork-cleanup.patch > sched-migrate-comment.patch > sched-style.patch > sched-migrate-affinity-race.patch > Post 'em. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||