Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 21 Dec 2003 01:57:09 +1100 | From | Nick Piggin <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH] 2.6.0-test11 sched_clock() broken for "drifty ITC" |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >So i believe the generic relaxing of sched_clock() synchronization is >the right thing to do. I like your patch. It adds minimal overhead and >solves a hard problem - nice work! Andrew, please apply it. > >
Its a great looking patch if you must have high res sched_clock. So I guess I agree with it.
Can we have a scheduler day when Andrew is ready to take patches for it? I have a few small changes that I'd like to get merged soon too (not sched domains - that should probably go to the mm tree for a while)
Relevant patches are sched-ctx-count-preempt.patch sched-fork-cleanup.patch sched-migrate-comment.patch sched-style.patch sched-migrate-affinity-race.patch
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |