![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > >So i believe the generic relaxing of sched_clock() synchronization is >the right thing to do. I like your patch. It adds minimal overhead and >solves a hard problem - nice work! Andrew, please apply it. > > Its a great looking patch if you must have high res sched_clock. So I guess I agree with it. Can we have a scheduler day when Andrew is ready to take patches for it? I have a few small changes that I'd like to get merged soon too (not sched domains - that should probably go to the mm tree for a while) Relevant patches are sched-ctx-count-preempt.patch sched-fork-cleanup.patch sched-migrate-comment.patch sched-style.patch sched-migrate-affinity-race.patch - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:59 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||