![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 12:30:23PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > But there really should be zero contention on the stdio data structures, > so the locking would have to be _seriously_ broken to make that kind o > fdifference (not necessarily buggy, but seriously badly implemented). > > A non-contended lock should be at most one locked instruction if well > done, both on LinuxThreads and NPTL. The results that I just posted are also for Red Hat 9, kernel 2.4.20-20.9. rugolsky@ti31: getconf GNU_LIBPTHREAD_VERSION NPTL 0.34 Ulrich's release notes for nptl-0.57 says: The changes are numerous and most of them were made by Jakub: ... ~ better stdio locking I don't have my laptop running Fedora handy, but that's the next thing to test. Regards, Bill Rugolsky - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||