lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2003]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 4 Nov 2003 12:30:23 -0800 (PST)
FromLinus Torvalds <>
SubjectRe: ext3 performance inconsistencies, 2.4/2.6
On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bill Rugolsky Jr. wrote:
> 
> Unless bonnie++ is using the _unlocked() variants, it might be an issue of
> the mutex overhead from NPTL v. LinuxThreads.  Red Hat 9 has its share
> of NPTL bugs.

Hmm.. That would easily explain the differences, since NPTL will trigger 
both on 2.6.0 and the RH-2.4 kernel, but not on the standard 2.4.22 
kernel.

But there really should be zero contention on the stdio data structures, 
so the locking would have to be _seriously_ broken to make that kind o 
fdifference (not necessarily buggy, but seriously badly implemented). 

A non-contended lock should be at most one locked instruction if well 
done, both on LinuxThreads and NPTL.

> It is probably worth rerunning the tests with LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.1 on
> the Red Hat kernel.

That would be interesting.

		Linus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:58    [from the cache]
©2003-2008